Question
1. What is the main subject of your question?
2. What subject guide or guides did you use to identify the relevant databases for your question?
Answer
1. My main subject of question is "Maltreatment dimensions."
2. I don't know how to categorize "Maltreatment dimensions," so I used "Social Works" as a subject guide.
Question
1. Which database did you choose for your search?
2. What terms did you enter to conduct your search?
3. How many results did you retrieve?
4. If there were more than about 100 results, how did you refine your search terms to narrow your results?
5. Once you got your results to around 100 (or fewer), how did you determine they were meaningful?
6. Which article did you choose? Give the bibliographic information for that article.
7. How did you determine these articles were meaningful?
First Database
Answer
1. I used Academic Search Premier
2. I entered "Maltreatment dimensions"
3. It hit 5 results.
4. I could get limited results, so I think it is unnecessary to narrow my term; however, if I got more than 100 results, I would use Boolean or change the phrase.
5. I would determine them by checking their abstract and keywords or by C.A.R.D.I.O.
6. I chose "The dimensions of maltreatment: Introduction."
Authors: English, Diana J.
Bangdiwala, Shrikant I.
Runyan, Desmond K.
Publisher: Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science
The Boulevard
Langford Lane
Kidlington
Oxford OX5 1GB
United Kingdom
Bibliographic Records: 07/01/1996 to present
Source: Child Abuse & Neglect; May2005, Vol. 29 Issue 5, p441-460, 20p
URL: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&jid=CHC&site=ehost-live
7. I determined it is meaningful for fitting my topic well. I read the abstract and it shows exactly what I want know.
In addition, this article was put on the top of the results list, so I felt it might be useful at first.
Second Database
Answer
1. I chose "Social Service Abstract."
2. I entered "Maltreatment dimensions."
3. It hit 8 results.
4. Same as first database, I could get limited results.
5. I would check the title of the article. I think it will be aim for narrow the subject.
6. I chose "Concordance Between Adolescent Reports of Childhood Abuse and Child Protective Service Determinations in an At-Risk Sample of Young Adolescents"
Authors: Everson, Mark D
Smith, Jamie B
Hussey, jon M
English, Diana
Litrownik, Alan J
Dubowitz, Howard
Thompson, Richard
Knight, Elizabeth Dawes
Runyan, Desmond K
Source: Child Maltreatment, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 14-26, Feb. 2008
Publication Year: 2008
Publication Type: Journal Article
Publisher: Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA
Update: 20080903
7. It fits my subject well besides there are same author in this article as first article I found. For example, English, Diana and Runyan, Desmond K. It will be aim to select contents of the article.
2009年2月23日月曜日
2009年2月17日火曜日
Unit 4 Part 1 research log entry 2-B
For your search in Academic Search Premier
Question
1. What terms did you enter to conduct your search?
2. How many results did you retrieve?
3. If there were more than about 100 results, how did you refine your search terms to narrow your results?
4. What differences did you note in how you needed to manipulate your search terms in this different database?
5. Once you got your results to around 100 (or fewer), how did you determine they were meaningful?
6. Which article did you choose? Give the bibliographic information for that article (I must be able to access this article).
7. How did you determine this article was meaningful?
Answer
1. I entered "Maltreatment dimensions."
2. I retrieved 5 results.
3. I could get only several results in this time. However if there were more than about 100 results, I'll use search options like search models and limit your results. Or I'll use Advanced Search.
4. I noted "view links" tool. It is very useful. When I used "ProQuest Newspaper" I didn't find such a good tool.
5. I'll check that abstract or supplied keyword and subject. If they suit on my topic, I determine they are meaningful.
6. "Do allegations of emotional maltreatment predict developmental outcomes beyond that of other forms of maltreatment?"
Author: Schneider, Mary Wood/ Ross, Anita/ Graham, J. Christopher/ Zielinski, Angiela
Source: Child Abuse & Neglect; May 2005, vol.29 Issue 5, p513-532, 20p
Document Type: Article
ISSN: 01452134
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.08.010
7. I checked that abstract, subject terms, and Author supplied keywords, and then I decided it is meaningful.
There are what I want to know about maltreatment and what is more, they provide extra information related with my topic.
Question
1. What terms did you enter to conduct your search?
2. How many results did you retrieve?
3. If there were more than about 100 results, how did you refine your search terms to narrow your results?
4. What differences did you note in how you needed to manipulate your search terms in this different database?
5. Once you got your results to around 100 (or fewer), how did you determine they were meaningful?
6. Which article did you choose? Give the bibliographic information for that article (I must be able to access this article).
7. How did you determine this article was meaningful?
Answer
1. I entered "Maltreatment dimensions."
2. I retrieved 5 results.
3. I could get only several results in this time. However if there were more than about 100 results, I'll use search options like search models and limit your results. Or I'll use Advanced Search.
4. I noted "view links" tool. It is very useful. When I used "ProQuest Newspaper" I didn't find such a good tool.
5. I'll check that abstract or supplied keyword and subject. If they suit on my topic, I determine they are meaningful.
6. "Do allegations of emotional maltreatment predict developmental outcomes beyond that of other forms of maltreatment?"
Author: Schneider, Mary Wood/ Ross, Anita/ Graham, J. Christopher/ Zielinski, Angiela
Source: Child Abuse & Neglect; May 2005, vol.29 Issue 5, p513-532, 20p
Document Type: Article
ISSN: 01452134
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.08.010
7. I checked that abstract, subject terms, and Author supplied keywords, and then I decided it is meaningful.
There are what I want to know about maltreatment and what is more, they provide extra information related with my topic.
2009年2月16日月曜日
Unit 4 Part 1 research log entry 2-A
For your first database:
Question
1. Which database did you choose for your first search?
2. What terms did you enter to conduct your search?
3. How many results did you retrieve?
4. If there were more than about 100 results, how did you refine your search terms to narrow your results?
5. Once you got your results to around 100 (or fewer), how did you determine they were meaningful?
6. Which article did you choose? Give the bibliographic information for that article (I must be able to access this article).
7. How did you determine this article was meaningful?
Answer
1. I chose "ProQuest Newspapers"
2. I searched "neglect"
3. I retrieved 148438 documents
4. I narrowed my topic with suggestions in topic guide.
"neglect" - 148438 > "Child abuse & neglect" - 41945 > "Murders & murder attempts" - 7043 > "Babies" - 361 > "mothers" - 11 > "teenagers" - 1 result
5. As you can see, I could get 1 result with topic guide. In topic guide, I chose a term that I want to know and related with my topic. I entered what I want to know, so it completely matches to my topic because it includes all information I searched.
6." The Region; Teen Mother Won't Serve Prison Time for killing Newborn; Courts: Judge whose only sentencing options were life term or none notes girl's remorse and depression at the time she stabbed her daughter with scissors."
Author: Gene Maddaus and David Hermann
Publication title: Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif: May 23, 2001. pg. B.6
Source type: Newspaper
ISSN: 04583035
Document URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb ?did=73262524&sid=8 &Fmt=3&clientId=17850&RQT=309&VName=PQD
7. I read the abstract, and I decided it is meaningful.
Question
1. Which database did you choose for your first search?
2. What terms did you enter to conduct your search?
3. How many results did you retrieve?
4. If there were more than about 100 results, how did you refine your search terms to narrow your results?
5. Once you got your results to around 100 (or fewer), how did you determine they were meaningful?
6. Which article did you choose? Give the bibliographic information for that article (I must be able to access this article).
7. How did you determine this article was meaningful?
Answer
1. I chose "ProQuest Newspapers"
2. I searched "neglect"
3. I retrieved 148438 documents
4. I narrowed my topic with suggestions in topic guide.
"neglect" - 148438 > "Child abuse & neglect" - 41945 > "Murders & murder attempts" - 7043 > "Babies" - 361 > "mothers" - 11 > "teenagers" - 1 result
5. As you can see, I could get 1 result with topic guide. In topic guide, I chose a term that I want to know and related with my topic. I entered what I want to know, so it completely matches to my topic because it includes all information I searched.
6." The Region; Teen Mother Won't Serve Prison Time for killing Newborn; Courts: Judge whose only sentencing options were life term or none notes girl's remorse and depression at the time she stabbed her daughter with scissors."
Author: Gene Maddaus and David Hermann
Publication title: Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif: May 23, 2001. pg. B.6
Source type: Newspaper
ISSN: 04583035
Document URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb ?did=73262524&sid=8 &Fmt=3&clientId=17850&RQT=309&VName=PQD
7. I read the abstract, and I decided it is meaningful.
Unit 4 Part 1
Periodical
Question
1. What three periodicals did you choose?
2. Name three articles, one from each of the three journals you chose.
3. What are the major differences among these articles?
4. What are the major differences among these periodicals?
Answer
1. A. Newsweek (February 9, 2009)
B. American Bar association Journal (Vol.1 1915)
c. Journal of Chemical Ecology (Vol 28, No 3 March 2002)
2. A. "A 'Slumdog' in Heat" P, 42
B. "CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE BUREAU OF COMPARATIVE LAW" P,65
-A. NOTE ON INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW, AND GENERAL JURISPRUDENCE.
C. "SEX PHEROMONE OF TUSSOCK MOTH" P, 449
3. The major differences among these articles are the context, the composition, and the source of articles I feel.
"Newsweek" has a picture attracted readers and interview in the article.
"American Bar association Journal" looks like reference book with many informational examples.
"Journal of Chemical Ecology" has statistical article.
4. The major differences among these periodicals is almost same what I wrote as articles.
"Newsweek" is the most popular book because of the components like many pictures, variety of information, rankings , and interviews. On the other hand, lest of "American Bar association Journal" and "Journal of Chemical Ecology" publish more professional articles. The major difference between these periodicals is the way to write articles. "American Bar association Journal" writes many examples? articles? about topic; meanwhile, "Journal of Chemical Ecology" put many graph or statistics on articles.
Question
1. What three periodicals did you choose?
2. Name three articles, one from each of the three journals you chose.
3. What are the major differences among these articles?
4. What are the major differences among these periodicals?
Answer
1. A. Newsweek (February 9, 2009)
B. American Bar association Journal (Vol.1 1915)
c. Journal of Chemical Ecology (Vol 28, No 3 March 2002)
2. A. "A 'Slumdog' in Heat" P, 42
B. "CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE BUREAU OF COMPARATIVE LAW" P,65
-A. NOTE ON INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW, AND GENERAL JURISPRUDENCE.
C. "SEX PHEROMONE OF TUSSOCK MOTH" P, 449
3. The major differences among these articles are the context, the composition, and the source of articles I feel.
"Newsweek" has a picture attracted readers and interview in the article.
"American Bar association Journal" looks like reference book with many informational examples.
"Journal of Chemical Ecology" has statistical article.
4. The major differences among these periodicals is almost same what I wrote as articles.
"Newsweek" is the most popular book because of the components like many pictures, variety of information, rankings , and interviews. On the other hand, lest of "American Bar association Journal" and "Journal of Chemical Ecology" publish more professional articles. The major difference between these periodicals is the way to write articles. "American Bar association Journal" writes many examples? articles? about topic; meanwhile, "Journal of Chemical Ecology" put many graph or statistics on articles.
2009年2月7日土曜日
Unit 3 part 2
1. Which of your questions did you try to answer?
- What was decided in Kyoto protocol?
As Ms Aline says, "Human ecology" is still broad topic, so I narrowed it to "Kyoto protocol" because that is related with Ecology today.
2. What EXACT terms did you enter into the keyword search screen?
- "Kyoto protocol"
3. What subject heading did you choose to be sure your item was on target and the best option for your search?
- Climatic changes-Government policy-Japan
4. What item did you eventually choose? Why?
- I chose " Japan and the Kyoto Protocol : conditions for ratification" because from the outset, wanted to know Ecology movement in Japan, and I believe this book give me the information that I want to know.
5. Give the bibliographic information for the item you chose.
- Author: Hiroshi Matsumura
Title: Japan and the Kyoto Protocol : conditions for ratification
Publ. Info: London : Royal Institute of International Affairs, Energy and Environment Programme ; Washington, DC : distributed worldwide by the Brookings Institution, 2000
Location: Book Stacks
Call No: HC465.A4 M37 2000
Status: ON THE SHELF
6. When you looked at the reference work, what quote did you choose? Why?
- I chose "Kyoto protocol" because it is a proper noun, so it shows exact information I thought.
7. What makes this a reference book as opposed to a regular book you might find in the book stacks?
- This a reference book gives me directly the exact information I wanted to know; on the other hand, a regular book takes time to find the information, besides it sometimes doesn't cover basic information but only an entirely information I guess.
8. In looking at the material in the book and the publication date in the bibliographic information, what year do you think the information really comes from?
- 2008. When I check the material in the library, it says it was published in 2008.
- What was decided in Kyoto protocol?
As Ms Aline says, "Human ecology" is still broad topic, so I narrowed it to "Kyoto protocol" because that is related with Ecology today.
2. What EXACT terms did you enter into the keyword search screen?
- "Kyoto protocol"
3. What subject heading did you choose to be sure your item was on target and the best option for your search?
- Climatic changes-Government policy-Japan
4. What item did you eventually choose? Why?
- I chose " Japan and the Kyoto Protocol : conditions for ratification" because from the outset, wanted to know Ecology movement in Japan, and I believe this book give me the information that I want to know.
5. Give the bibliographic information for the item you chose.
- Author: Hiroshi Matsumura
Title: Japan and the Kyoto Protocol : conditions for ratification
Publ. Info: London : Royal Institute of International Affairs, Energy and Environment Programme ; Washington, DC : distributed worldwide by the Brookings Institution, 2000
Location: Book Stacks
Call No: HC465.A4 M37 2000
Status: ON THE SHELF
6. When you looked at the reference work, what quote did you choose? Why?
- I chose "Kyoto protocol" because it is a proper noun, so it shows exact information I thought.
7. What makes this a reference book as opposed to a regular book you might find in the book stacks?
- This a reference book gives me directly the exact information I wanted to know; on the other hand, a regular book takes time to find the information, besides it sometimes doesn't cover basic information but only an entirely information I guess.
8. In looking at the material in the book and the publication date in the bibliographic information, what year do you think the information really comes from?
- 2008. When I check the material in the library, it says it was published in 2008.
2009年2月4日水曜日
Unit 3 part 1
What I wanted to search was different with my topic "Ecology system in Japan today," maybe because of my English skill, so I changed my topic to "Ecology movement for Global warming." This is what I really want to search.
1.
a) Author
- Moran, Edward
b) Title
- The global ecology
c) Edition
- unknown
d) Place of publication
- New York
e) Publisher
- H.W. Wilson
f) Date of publication
- 1999
2.
a) Location
- Book Stacks
b) LC Call number
- GE140 .G55 1999
c) Status
- ON THE SHELF
3.
a) "Ecology movement for Global warming" - No hit
b) "Ecology movement" - No hit
but near by
- "Ecology, law and economics : the simple analytics of natural resource and environmental economics / edited by Nicholas Mercuro" -History
4.
"Ecology movement" -Ecology
1 entry, but it didn't match to my question
the other relevant entry- 9 entry
- it matches to my topic more.
5.
a) Do you have more or fewer entries with your subject heading search than with your keyword search?
- Subject heading search has fewer entries than keyword search. However it didn't match to my topic at this time.
b) As you examine these results, are they more on target than the results you retrieved from your keyword search?
- I don't think so.
c) Why?
- Because subject heading search is difficult for people who is not good at English especially me. For hitting exactly what I want to search, I need grammar. In my case, I prefer to keyword search.
6.
Difference between subject heading search and keyword search.
- Keyword search is just searching the keyword, so its entries becomes larger.
On the other hand, subject heading search is more limited. So if you have clear subject heading, it had better use it to hit exact information. I think you can use both by your situation. I mean that as I wrote, if you have clear goal, you had better use subject heading search, and if you have vague idea, you had better use keyword search because it may give you some new idea about a topic.
1.
a) Author
- Moran, Edward
b) Title
- The global ecology
c) Edition
- unknown
d) Place of publication
- New York
e) Publisher
- H.W. Wilson
f) Date of publication
- 1999
2.
a) Location
- Book Stacks
b) LC Call number
- GE140 .G55 1999
c) Status
- ON THE SHELF
3.
a) "Ecology movement for Global warming" - No hit
b) "Ecology movement" - No hit
but near by
- "Ecology, law and economics : the simple analytics of natural resource and environmental economics / edited by Nicholas Mercuro" -History
4.
"Ecology movement" -Ecology
1 entry, but it didn't match to my question
the other relevant entry- 9 entry
- it matches to my topic more.
5.
a) Do you have more or fewer entries with your subject heading search than with your keyword search?
- Subject heading search has fewer entries than keyword search. However it didn't match to my topic at this time.
b) As you examine these results, are they more on target than the results you retrieved from your keyword search?
- I don't think so.
c) Why?
- Because subject heading search is difficult for people who is not good at English especially me. For hitting exactly what I want to search, I need grammar. In my case, I prefer to keyword search.
6.
Difference between subject heading search and keyword search.
- Keyword search is just searching the keyword, so its entries becomes larger.
On the other hand, subject heading search is more limited. So if you have clear subject heading, it had better use it to hit exact information. I think you can use both by your situation. I mean that as I wrote, if you have clear goal, you had better use subject heading search, and if you have vague idea, you had better use keyword search because it may give you some new idea about a topic.
登録:
投稿 (Atom)